Archive page from 1996/97. Re-published on www.ecoversity.org.au in July 2004.

IMAGINE THE FUTURE
... because we humans can only work for a future we can imagine.


Small golden moths orchid (D. Sp. aff Lanceolata) by Jeffrey Jeans. Australia. Protected by copyright.SMALL GOLDEN MOTHS ORCHID (D. Sp. aff Lanceolata) AN ORCHID AT THE EDGE

Colin Hocking
Faculty of Science and Engineering
Victoria University of Technology

Both photograph and article are protected by copyright, 1997.


The small Golden Moths Orchid is endemic to the Western Basalt Plains Grassland community. This community is listed as threatened on Schedule 2 of the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988 (FFG) and is regarded as being one of the most endangered in Australia. The grasslands are fragmented and as a result, no recruitment can occur between remnant populations of endemic grassland flora and fauna species, thus increasing the loss of biodiversity in local gene pools. At least one orchid species, the Dwarf Spider Orchid, (Caladenia pumilia ) is believed to be extinct and others, including the Fragrant Doubletail (Diuris fragrantissima ) are on the brink. Only 2,000 hectares (0.1%) remain of the estimated 2,000,000 hectares of grassland that existed prior to European settlement. Of this only 200 ha (0.01%) is secure within conservation reserves. The remainder is located on freehold land, road verges, rail reserves and cemeteries and it has been estimated that 70% of this will be lost within the next two years (Hocking, pers comm).

The Small Golden Moths Orchid, once known from several sites, has gradually become reduced in numbers as a result of a variety of human pressures and poor management practices. It is now only known to occur for certain on one site at North Altona and is in a state of decline and threatened with extinction. Past attempts to translocate the orchid to a nearby area proved unsuccessful, possibly due to the absence of the appropriate mycorrhiza (Tonkinson pers comm). The land, known as the Sough Estate, is freehold, and zoned industrial under the former City of Altona Planning Scheme. The owner intends to develop the site and a part of the land has been sold to Specialised Container Transport P/L. This group now proposes to erect a rail freight centre along with a 1.5 km spur line.

As a result of these threats and the orchid's rarity, a Critical Habitat at Assessment was prepared and signed off by the Secretary to the Department of Natural Resources and Environment. This however, has not been followed through. The area may also be critical habitat for the orchid's pollinator which is believed to be the small native sweat or alkali bee, Lasioglossum lanarium (Walker 1995).

The orchid has now been given a final recommendation for listing as threatened taxon under the FFG Act. Several other species listed as threatened under the FFG Act are also known to occur on the land. These include the Plains Rice Flower (Pimelia spinescens ) and the Small Milkwort (Comesperma polygaloides ). A scientific survey of the site is to be carried out in order to determine its botanical and fauna values. The primary emphasis will be to establish the location and extent of the population of Small Golden Moths Orchids on the site and the role and needs of the pollinator.

The question that now needs to be asked is how did things the to this point?

The site was well known to botanists and others, including members of Government Departments, ANOS and students from La Trobe University but, as is so often the case, no action was taken to either establish the requirements of the orchid, or to purchase the site. As a result series of events have taken place over the past few months that have substantially increased the risk to the orchid, its pollinator, and the other Western Basalt Plains Grassland flora and fauna species that occur on the land.

It is now my intention to discuss this and to look at what needs to be done in the future if we are to avoid a repeat of this situation.

What went wrong?

The first thing that went wrong was the inertia and lack of political will which seems to overcome our ability to act prior to a critical event taking place.

We speak glibly of habitat destruction being a major cause of extinction but how often do we think about what this entails? We are talking about cracks appearing in the biosphere on which we are all dependent, and because we don't know enough about how natural systems operate, we can't predict at what points these will start to collapse.

We seem to lurch from crisis to crisis with ever increasing despair and failure despite the existence of comprehensive and potentially powerful and proactive legislation in Victoria as the Flora and Fauna Guarantee Act 1988.

This Act provides a number of measures designed to protect native flora and fauna. The most powerful of these is the ability to declare an area Critical Habitat for a threatened species or community. This provides a clear signal that there are important conservation values, requiring a high level of protection, associated with a particular piece of land. A slight weakness in the Act is the inability to declare an area as being Critical Habitat for a listed ecological community on freehold land. However, as listed communities usually also contain listed species, this could be overcome in most cases. The Critical Habitat Assessment signed off for the Small Golden Moths Orchid is of particular significance, because it is the first one signed off in Victoria and possibly in Australia.

The Critical Habitat Assessment can be followed by an Interim Conservation Order. This is made by the Minister and is designed to provide a breathing space during which negotiations are entered into. To date, no ICO has been implemented. This of course begs the question of why?

The answer would appear to lie in a reluctance to pay compensation. Section 41 of the Act gives a land holder who suffers financial loss, the right to apply for compensation. The Secretary to the Department of Natural Resources and Environment (NRE) is then required to determine the amount of compensation to which the person is entitled. This could potentially prove expensive and unpopular with tax payers. The Department's preferred approach is to negotiate with the land owner in an attempt to achieve the preservation of the threatened species while permitting development to proceed, albeit in a modified form. Preservation may be through the use of a Land Management Agreement. This is a legal contract between the Department and the land owner made under the provisions of Section 69 of the Conservation Forests and Lands Act 1979. In the case of the Small Golden Moths Orchid, it has been suggested that a portion of the site be set aside as open space. To date no area has been determined but the proposed survey will be used to help determine this.

What our long term objectives should be

Our accumulated failures require us to move beyond crisis management. We need to develop new and more effective methods of dealing with conservation issues.

We need to start looking at our planning laws and develop methods of dealing with problems before they arise instead of continually playing some form of catch up which sees us ever further behind. Proper forward planning would eliminate the need for rescue digs, ex situ conservation, and the unsatisfactory compromises that seem to be so much part of conservation work.

The effort we put into saving isolated remnants should be directed to encouraging the community and the various levels of Government to recognise the importance of retaining what is left of our natural ecosystems.

At the Federal and State level, this could mean encouraging legislators to look beyond the immediate and to work together to achieve uniform, high level flora and fauna controls. At a State level, it may mean amending planning laws in ways that would make the protection of the natural environment the highest priority. For example, legislation could be used to strengthen the requirements on local Councils under State Planning Schemes. The required changes would place the onus on Council to preserve local bushland rather than pushing for development of these areas.

Local Government should be encouraged to work with other agencies and local communities to develop planning policy which would then apply across the board, rather than the current system of guidelines which may or may not be followed.

Much information is already available and needs only to be properly collated. For example, orchid populations could receive appropriate levels of protection if reference books such as Orchids of Victoria where used as source material. This book clearly identifies where orchid populations are located, the threats facing them, and proposes courses of action necessary to ensure their future survival.

In addition, we need to carry out research to determine what changes are occurring within local ecosystems and why. Only then can we hope to reverse these changes and restore the balance.

Better biological information would also bring other benefits. For example, it would enable Councils to develop a system of maps showing areas of biological significance which would act as overlays to the base zoning maps. Under such a system, a species listed under the FFG Act would be ranked at Level 1 and accorded the highest level of protection. This would enable persons proposing to purchase land, to go to Council and check for any impediments to development as they currently do for zonings and easements.

For any of these changes to occur would require a drastic change in our attitude towards land ownership. Under our current system, the rights of the land owner are considered paramount and the main emphasis is on development and wealth creation. The changes I envisage would require a return to the view that it is the health of the land that is significant.

It will take all of us working together if we are to save what is left of our natural ecosystems, particularly those at greatest risk, the remnants on the urban fringes such as the Western Basalt Plains Grasslands. There will be cost but with good will and determination, it is possible to spread the burden so it does not fall unfairly on any individual or group of individuals. Properly presented, the notion that conservation values come first could become widely accepted within the wider community. Our long term survival may depend on it.

In the interim

We continue to work to bring change to community attitudes and to encourage the retention of the remaining natural biological communities.



Return to the possum skin cloak
To About the project
To the Bioregion
To the Painting the Future Real home page.
To the Imagine The Future Inc home page.

'Painting the future real' is an initiative of Imagine The Future Inc with the support of project partners.
For more information, contact Imagine The Future at
340 Gore Street, Fitzroy, Victoria 3065, Australia
phone: +61 3 9417 2033, fax: +61 3 9416 0767
email: imagine@peg.apc.org, or merrillf@dingo.vut.edu.au

Archive page from 1996/97. Re-published on www.ecoversity.org.au in July 2004.